As a powerful stimulus for business, project finance and lease financing can help companies upgrade production assets, accelerate the introduction of new technologies, reduce the time it takes to launch new products, and simplify the supply of innovative equipment and its maintenance.

In addition, leasing schemes in project finance can reduce the risk of financial losses during the development of new projects and, to a certain extent, simplify the process of obtaining loans.

As a result, the business is expanding opportunities for its modernization and expansion in many areas.

In other words, Project finance and lease financing serves as an important tool for upgrading the industrial potential of enterprises and increasing the efficiency of investments and innovation.

According to the classical definition, “leasing” refers to the transfer by the lessor to the lessee for a certain period of time of assets that are the property of the lessor or were acquired by him on behalf and in agreement with the lessee from the relevant seller (manufacturer).

This mechanism involves the payment of transferred assets by the lessee in the form of periodic lease payments and often provides for the possibility of purchasing assets after the expiration of the agreement.

Although the object of lease can be almost any asset used in the production cycle, experts note some limitations, depending on the national legislation and other circumstances. In some countries, land plots and other natural objects cannot be leased. Depending on the type of asset, there are leasing of movable assets and leasing of real estate.

A special category in this context is finance lease, which is widely used in project finance (it will be described in detail below).

The following assets can be transferred under a lease agreement:

• Vehicles including trucks, ships and freight cars.
• Construction machinery including heavy equipment for drilling and other work.
• Agricultural machinery, tractors, combine harvesters and equipment of all types.
• Pipelines, roads, overpasses, substations and power lines.
• Digital communications and electronic equipment.
• Machine tools and other production equipment.
• Commercial and industrial buildings.

Given the legislative complexity and numerous market barriers, the organizers of project finance (PF) schemes have to make a lot of efforts to effectively organize lease financing of large projects.

The key to success should be a rational contractual structure of the lease agreement, which protects the interests of all project participants.

Lease participants and their interests

Among the classic participants in this type of relationship are the manufacturer / seller of equipment, lessor and lessee.

It should be understood that the lessor and the lessee are direct parties to the lease agreement. They may be represented by individuals, financial institutions (banks), manufacturers, suppliers, and organizations operating in the leasing field.

The lessor is a legal entity that acquires expensive assets from the manufacturer (seller) and transfers it to the lessee in accordance with the terms of the lease agreement.

The functions of a lessor are usually performed by specialized companies. Banks, other financial institutions and manufacturers (machine-building plants, construction firms, and others) can also be lessors.

The benefits of lease financing for the lessor are listed below:

• Acceleration of business development
• Promoting the marketing of innovative products.
• Simplify the sale of used equipment.
• Obtaining significant income after the sale of assets at a high salvage value using accelerated depreciation schemes.
• Promoting the maximum use of productive resources.
• Reducing the risk of customer insolvency.
• An additional source of profit for companies.
• Tax incentives and so on.

The lessee is a legal entity that receives assets for temporary use under a lease agreement.

From the point of view of the lessee, the economic benefits of leasing operations can be divided into four groups, which are listed below.

Project finance and lease financing provides the lessee with the following advantages:

• An available source of resources for the renewal of fixed assets.
• Reducing the company’s need for initial equity capital.
• Diversification of sources of financing for capital-intensive projects.
• Minimize the use of internal business resources.
• Flexible schedule for paying the cost of assets.

An important place in this list is given to tax incentives. In some countries, lessors may “pass on” depreciation tax credits to lessees.

In addition, lease payments are usually charged to the company’s gross expenses, which reduces the tax base.

A manufacturer or seller is a legal entity acting as the owner of the property selected by the lessee, which enters into an agreement for the sale of a specific asset. This function in the leasing market is most often performed by manufacturers, but this role can also be played by large firms engaged in wholesale trade in machinery and equipment (including international companies).

Any legal entity operating legally and whose activities do not contradict international and national standards, including the requirements of the UNDROIT Convention on International Financial Leasing (Ottawa), can act as a manufacturer or seller of leasing objects.

It may be one of the many international suppliers of industrial equipment, vehicles, agricultural machinery and technology.

Most of the leasing companies at present are affiliated banking structures and companies actually created by industrial organizations to promote their products around the world. Commercial leasing companies created by banks, as well as specialized divisions of commercial banks, are the most powerful group of leasing companies active in developing countries.

They provide leasing services to a wide range of customers, but in some cases the bank prefers to serve a limited circle of regular customers. In the practice of many countries, it is accepted that commercial banks not only finance the activities of leasing companies, but also recommend their clients to be serviced by a certain leasing company.

Obviously, such companies, which are part of the structure of large commercial banks, have a high potential, a significant range of clients and a high position in the leasing market.

Indirect participants in project finance and lease financing of large projects include the following entities:

• Reputable insurance companies that protect the property and financial interests of lessors, lessees and manufacturers.

• Joint investment institutions that accumulate significant financial resources for the purpose of further investment in promising leasing projects.

• Investment banks lending to the lessor and acting as guarantors of the safe implementation of large leasing operations.

• Consulting companies that help the lessee to receive high-quality consulting services and learn more information about the leasing market.

In order to support financial and business activity at a certain level, government bodies are also actively involved in leasing, regulating the leasing business, creating conditions for increasing the interest and initiative of all subjects in organizing and implementing important projects.

Finance lease in project finance schemes

Although leasing has various features, below we will focus only on those that are related to the financing of large investment projects.

It is necessary to dwell in more detail on finance lease and leverage leasing. In the context of project finance, finance lease plays a vital role in financing investment projects, such as power plants, factories, infrastructure, etc.

Finance lease agreements are agreements that provide for the payment, within a clearly defined base period, of lease payments that are sufficient to fully reimburse the lessor’s costs associated with the acquisition of property, as well as to earn an adequate profit. 

Finance lease (capital lease) is the acquisition of assets for the purpose of their subsequent transfer for temporary use for a period approaching the period of its operation and depreciation of all or most of the value of these assets. During the term of the agreement, the lessor recovers the entire value of the assets through lease payments and receives an adequate profit, and the lessee acquires ownership rights at the end of the lease agreement.

The main features characterizing finance lease:

• The lessor initially acquires the asset not for its own use, but specifically for leasing it.

• The client has the full right to choose the leasing assets and the seller company.

• The seller of the assets knows that the asset (equipment) is being purchased for leasing.

• The asset is directly delivered to the customer and put into operation.

• The object of leasing is taken on the balance sheet of the company-lessee.

• Claims for the quality of assets and a request for the correction of defects during the warranty period, the lessee sends directly to the seller.

• The risk of loss and damage to the asset passes to the lessee after signing the Transfer-Acceptance Act of leasing assets.

It is an important mechanism within project finance schemes.

Large companies using finance lease can carry out large investment projects in order to expand existing production facilities by purchasing fixed assets. SMEs and young companies, including those at the development stage, can use leasing leverage to implement capital-intensive investment projects to acquire assets that are not available to them through bank loans or other sources of funds.

The large-scale modernization of companies and the development of large projects with a long payback period require businesses to look for new approaches to increase the scale and timing of financing and reduce the cost of attracted financial resources.

This can be achieved using leverage leasing, which is considered one of the most complex lease financing schemes.

This scheme best meets the needs of project finance.

For example, investment projects for the purchase of equipment for hydropower plants (turbines) or the construction of oil platforms in the ocean. It is clear that at the end of the term of the agreement, such assets cannot be dismantled by lessees and returned to the lessor, so clients will have to buy such assets from the owners.

Leverage leasing requires a clear coordination of the actions of a significant number of participants in the framework of large-scale investment projects with an implementation period of 20-25 years or more. The complexity of leverage leasing is explained by the fact that a significant number of participants participate in this operation, among which there may be several owners, shareholders, creditors and sellers.

The group of co-investors of the project on the part of the lessor may be the shareholders of a special company (lessor) that directly enters into a lease agreement.

Such participants finance a certain part of the funds necessary for the purchase of assets. They use a limited amount of their own funds, typically around 20% of the initial asset value. Funds are usually raised through the issuance and placement of securities. The main part of the funds (about 80%) for the acquisition of assets is attracted by a group of creditors, which usually consists of commercial banks. In the scheme above, the leverage ratio is 4.

Leveraged leasing transactions involving multiple parties typically involve two representatives. One of them coordinates actions and represents the interests of banks. In turn, the representative of the lessor manages the actions of another group of participants (the management company).

Such a company acts in the person of the lessor, concludes a lease agreement, signs agreements for the sale of assets for leasing, a loan agreement and an insurance contract. Also, this company distributes the profit from the leasing project among the shareholders.

Here the similarity between leveraged project finance and leasing becomes apparent.

The use of leasing to finance a complex investment project gives the lessor the right, with insignificant own participation, to use tax and other benefits or preferences that apply to participants in finance lease, for example, accelerated depreciation. These benefits can reduce the amount of lease payments and provide savings to project participants compared to investment loans.

A typical leverage leasing model looks like a combination of a number of elements:

• A contract for the sale and purchase of an asset at the expense of the lessor’s own capital or funds received as a result of syndicated lending with limited recourse to the borrower.

• A lease agreement drawn up and signed on the terms and conditions detailed above.

• Assignment of receivables for lease payments due to repayment of debt on principal and interest.

Thanks to leverage leasing, the number of investment financial products is growing, which contributes to competition between various sources of financing and the expansion of financial opportunities for the implementation of investment projects in the most beneficial mode for participants.

The similarity of leverage leasing with syndicated lending, as world experience shows, can become a powerful “long” investment resource, involving the use of a complex and flexible contractual structure between participants. This scheme also increases the lessor’s interest in the lessee’s business.

Choosing leasing to finance large projects

New global trends in project finance help mitigate the risks and attract funding from various sources, including banks, private investors, and financial institutions.

Project finance (PF) is a form of financing used to fund large-scale infrastructure, energy or industrial projects.

In the new global trends in project finance, the financial structure is designed to be a “standalone” entity separate from the sponsors, and the project’s future cash flow and assets are used as collateral to secure financing. 

The significance of project finance in global economic development lies in its ability to facilitate the implementation of complex and capital-intensive projects that may otherwise be challenging to fund through traditional financing methods. Key features of project finance include risk allocation, where risks are assigned to the party best equipped to manage them, and a focus on the project’s future cash flows rather than the creditworthiness of the project sponsors.

This approach allows for the realization of essential infrastructure, energy, and other development projects, contributing to economic growth, job creation, and improved living standards on a global scale.

The new global trends in project finance will actively supports important initiatives ranging from major transportation and electrification projects to social infrastructure and sustainable development initiatives.

Brief overview of current trends in project finance

Last decade marks a pivotal juncture in the trajectory of large project financing, as stakeholders navigate a terrain defined by environmental imperatives, technological disruptions, and an intricate net of economic interdependencies.

From renewable energy sector facilities to digital infrastructure projects, the global stage is witnessing a confluence of trends that not only redefine traditional financing models but also reflect a broader commitment to sustainability and innovation.

In this exploration of current global trends in project finance, we must unravel new forces steering the area.

The dominance of renewable initiatives to close integration of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) considerations, this chapter seeks to provide insights into main drivers and transformative shifts influencing project finance practices on a worldwide scale. We must consider innovative financial models, changes of regulatory landscapes, and technologies.

To decipher the mosaic of trends in project finance, shaping the future is rapidly changing business world.

Some global trends in project finance that have become important are listed below;

Renewable energy dominance: Continued growth in project finance is now especially important for huge renewable energy projects (solar power plants mainly in Asia, Africa and Latin America, wind parks around the world, as well as geothermal projects in seismically active regions), with a focus on solar and wind. In the last few years increasing interest in “energy storage projects” (for example, pumped storage power plants) to address intermittency challenges associated with renewable sources.

Sustainability and ESG integration

The intersection of sustainability and project finance has become a characteristic feature of the contemporary international business landscape. There is a growing emphasis on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) considerations in project finance.

These considerations have already transcended mere corporate responsibility to emerge as critical factors influencing decision-making. This integration is reshaping the project finance landscape in numerous profound ways. Integration of sustainability principles in project design, execution, and reporting is currently important to meet global ESG standards.

Digital transformation of project finance

This means adoption of digital technologies, including blockchain and artificial intelligence, advanced FinTech solutions, using remote collaborative platforms and enhanced data analysis for better project efficiency and risk management. The digital transformation reflects a paradigm shift in the financial industry, promising increased return on capital, transparency, and adaptability.

As technologies continue to evolve, project finance stakeholders must navigate the opportunities and challenges presented by this transformative trend to stay competitive in the dynamic landscape.

Resilience planning

There is also heightened focus on resilience in project design and financing structures to address unforeseen challenges, such as pandemics, climate events, and geopolitical uncertainties. Resilience planning in project finance signifies a strategic approach to anticipating, preparing for, responding to, and recovering from unforeseen challenges and disruptions.

Transition to hydrogen economy

The global trend towards a hydrogen economy marks a significant shift in the energy landscape, emphasizing the role of hydrogen as a clean and versatile energy carrier. This transition involves the production, distribution, and utilization of hydrogen as an element in the decarbonization of various sectors, including industry, transportation, and energy storage.

As a zero-emission fuel, hydrogen is gaining traction as a viable solution to address environmental concerns and meet ambitious climate goals, with investments and large projects focusing on green hydrogen production methods to ensure sustainability and reduce carbon footprints.

Adaptation to regulatory changes

The global trend of adaptation to regulatory changes in project finance underscores the industry’s responsiveness to a continually evolving legal landscape. With an increased emphasis on environmental sustainability, social responsibility, and transparency, project financiers are navigating a complex net of regulations worldwide.

This trend necessitates a comprehensive approach, integrating regulatory compliance considerations into every stage of project development. From conducting deep environmental impact assessments to addressing social governance criteria, project financiers are proactively incorporating regulatory requirements into their planning and execution strategies.

This adaptability not only ensures legal compliance but also mitigates potential risks, enhancing project resilience in the face of changing governmental policies and regulations. As regulatory frameworks continue to evolve, the ability to adeptly navigate and incorporate these changes is becoming a hallmark of successful and sustainable project finance initiatives.

Innovation in financing models

Innovation in financing models is reshaping the landscape of project finance, introducing creative and adaptive approaches to fund large-scale initiatives. Traditional funding is being complemented by emerging models such as crowdfunding, peer-to-peer lending, and digital securities issuance.

This trend reflects a dynamic shift towards diversification in funding sources, providing project stakeholders with more flexibility and efficiency in securing capital. As the financial ecosystem continues to evolve, the exploration and implementation of innovative financing models are becoming integral to fostering resilience and adaptability in large project financing.

Role of project finance in funding large-scale projects

In essence, project finance serves as a pillar in funding large-scale infrastructure and development projects by providing a flexible and collaborative financial structure.

Its role extends beyond mere funding, influencing the project success, overall economic impact, and contribution to sustainable development goals. As the global demand for transformative projects grows, PF continues to be a vital enabler of progress on an international scale.

Project finance plays a crucial role in funding large-scale energy, industrial, infrastructure and development projects, offering a tailored financial structure that addresses the unique challenges associated with these ventures.

PF initially did not play a priority social and economic role, but in the last decade this can truly be called a key global trend in project finance.

Large-scale projects funded through project finance encourage job creation, generate employment opportunities, contributing to local and regional economic growth. These projects actively stimulate economic activity beyond the construction phase, benefiting related industries and services.

Project finance enables the integration of sustainable practices, aligning projects with environmental and social responsibility goals.

Among the most capital-intensive projects that could benefit from the use of PF tools, we can name DEWA CSP Project (UAE), Vineyard Wind Farm (United States), Transnordestina Railway Project (Brazil) and many others. Large initiatives in energy sector, industry and infrastructure may involve a combination of government funding, international financial support, and potentially project finance schemes for specific components.

Understanding the nuances of economic, political, and regulatory factors in host country is crucial for project financiers, investors, and policymakers to navigate the complex and dynamic landscape of global trends in project finance.

It’s essential to consult with experts and refer to current reports, analyses, and official government publications for the most accurate information.

CP Finance UK Finance is ready to provide you with comprehensive support when planning large investment projects, developing financial models, attracting long-term capital or bridge financing, project management, etc.

Contact us.

CP Finance UK FINANCE LIMITED
Website:https://c-pfinanceuk.com/
E-mail:finance@cpuk-financeltd.com
Alt-Email:admin@cpukfinanceltd.com

Models for financing a solar energy projects and the global renewable energy sector has shown steady growth over the past decades.

According to the Energy Outlook 2021, the combined market for wind and solar PV technology in Europe could grow by 35 GW during 2021, requiring an investment of 60 billion euros.

The International Energy Agency says wind power will grow by 8% and solar power by 13%.

Once completed, the solar power plant becomes the cheapest technology to operate for power generation, since solar radiation is available completely free of charge, and modern equipment requires minimal operating costs.

Thus, renewable energy sources easily displace fossil fuels as soon as they enter the market.

This gap will widen even further in 2021. Positive market trends plus preferential terms persisting in many countries will drive the sector’s growth. This is complemented by technological advances that have made newly built solar power plants cheaper on average than coal or nuclear power plants.

An important point in the context of increasing the competitiveness of solar energy is the correct choice models for financing a solar energy plant project.

Among the potential instruments for the implementation of these capital-intensive projects, long-term investment loans and complex project finance instruments are now available to businesses.

CP Finance UK offers the implementation of investment projects in the field of renewable energy around the world.

Our specialists are ready to provide customized solutions for each project, from long-term financing to the development of technical documentation and the construction of a solar power plant under an EPC contract.

Contact us.

Long-term bank loans as models for financing a solar energy plants

A bank loan is one of the oldest and most popular business financing instruments that remains in high demand in solar energy.

A significant percentage of the $ 2.7 trillion invested in renewable energy sources in the world over the previous decade came from long-term loans.

In general, there is no fundamental difference between short-term and long-term loans. Some of the features of the latter are listed below:

• Long-term loans for the construction of solar power plants are usually provided for a period of 5-7 years or more, depending on the type of project.

• The interest rate can be fixed or variable, the latter being common. Recently, loans with a more complex variable interest rate are often offered.

The volatility of interest rates makes it necessary to propose new financial transactions adapted to changing market conditions.

In this sense, the variable interest rate makes the financial model of the solar power plant project more flexible, adapting it to the general conditions of the financial environment. For this reason, banking operations that were previously subject to fixed interest rates are gradually being replaced by indexed loans (linked to the index), the parameters of which vary depending on market fluctuations.

Any lending operation involves the assumption of a certain risk by the lender.

As the maturity period increases, the uncertainty increases, so the requirement for guarantees that protect the lender becomes more common.

A loan for the implementation of a solar project can be protected by real guarantees in the form of securities, real estate, movable property and other valuable assets. If there is not enough collateral, the financial institution may request one or more guarantors to provide debt repayment in the event of a default on the borrower’s company.

Considering that the construction of a large solar power plant with an installed capacity of 100 MW may require about $ 80-100 million or more, some projects are financed by bank syndicates, rather than individual banks.

Syndicated loans are provided for the implementation of large projects and models for financing a solar energy through one credit operation.

This type of lending helps energy companies reconcile the demand for large volumes of financing with their desire to avoid excessive concentration of risk from financial institutions.

Benefits of investment loans for solar energy projects

Investment bank loans as models for financing a solar energy projects have become extremely popular and the ease of obtaining funds is far from the only reason for the demand for this versatile financial instrument.

Long-term bank loans, although used most often for solar projects, cannot be seen as ideal financing.

When determining models for financing a solar energy project, a company should consider the advantages and disadvantages of each of them in a specific business situation.

Disadvantages of using bank loans:

There are no ideal financial instruments.

Every company has a unique economic and financial situation, so not every solution for one company will work for another.

Business owners or those responsible for managing corporate finance should not forget about other alternative financing options that are emerging in the market and can often be more attractive than the popular investment loan.

Borrowers should understand current financial market offerings and carefully analyze individual offers.

The financial team of  CP Finance UK  is ready to provide you and your employees with comprehensive advice on the implementation of investment projects.

Project finance for solar power plants

The project finance (PF) method is one of the most advanced methods of raising funds for the construction of large solar power plants or other capital-intensive energy facilities.

The PF allows a business to attract significantly larger funds in comparison with traditional bank lending.

Large enterprises making long-term investments today are forced to attract capital from outside, since they rarely have significant amounts of their own funds. Various financial instruments come to the rescue, which include loans, leasing and project finance.

Energy companies that run several expensive projects at the same time or are faced with debts for previously consumed energy need capital for further development and implementation of large projects. PF opens up new opportunities for business expansion, relying on the prospects of a specific project, and not on the assets of the borrowing company.

Along with the growing popularity of project finance and the development of more and more efficient variants of Models for financing a solar energy, it is becoming suitable for smaller and smaller projects.

Choosing a model for financial a solar energy project

Companies that succeed in the auction often have limited time to expand their PV capacity.

What are the best models for financing a solar energy project today?

There are two main ways.

The first business models for financing a solar energy projects and  the construction of  the facility is through a long-term bank loan.

In many countries, such a loan is not difficult to obtain by holding a successful auction and submitting a serious business plan.

The second business model involves the organization of project finance (PF) with the involvement of an investor who, at a price determined depending on the capacity of a given facility, finances its construction and acquires ownership of this asset. Sometimes the company, in addition to cash injections associated with the completion of the solar power plant, receives a long-term contract for its maintenance.

The transaction is usually carried out as the purchase of shares in a limited liability company whose assets are a photovoltaic installation.

Typically, a long-term contract for the operation and maintenance of the facility is signed between the same parties.

The company that is the subject of the transaction receives a guaranteed sales price for the energy produced for 10-20 years and guarantees the estimated costs necessary to keep the installation at the highest level of efficiency.

This situation allows investors not only to gain know-how related to the engineering design and construction of power plants, but also to secure a long-term source of income. Equally important in this case is the availability of free funds that can be spent on the development of new projects.

How much does a 1 MW solar power plant cost?

The cost of building a solar power plant remains a secret, which is revealed to the initiator only as a result of detailed design calculations and negotiations with potential contractors and equipment suppliers.

The cost of each megawatt of installed capacity can be named only approximately, focusing on the specifics of the project and the market of the host country.

When developing models for financing a solar energy projects, it is important to take into account the complexity of the construction of such facilities, which in some cases are associated with a certain risk and unpredictability.

This is not only about the construction and installation time of equipment, which can vary from 3-6 months to 1 year or more, taking into account the scale and technical difficulties that may arise at the site.

The project depends on successful planning, engineering design of a solar farm, finding and preparing a suitable site for construction, obtaining licenses, supplying electrical components and metal structures, installation, etc.

If you are planning to build a large solar power plant, contact our consultants.

Our financial and technical team will help you get the expected construction cost estimate, select engineering solutions and determine the optimal financial model for a specific project.

CP Finance UK FINANCE LIMITED
Website:https://c-pfinanceuk.com/
E-mail:finance@cpuk-financeltd.com
Alt-Email:admin@cpukfinanceltd.com

Funding for thermal power plants projects is declining every year, but the use of fossil fuel energy remains a bridge linking the modern economy with an innovative carbon-free model of the future.

The growth of renewable energy sources in recent decades heralds an imminent green transformation of the global energy sector.

Against this background, investment projects in the field of coal energy over the past decade have decreased by almost 5 times, retaining, however, a dominant role only in the PRC and developing countries of Asia.

According to the Sustainable Finance Program (Oxford University), the cost of borrowed funds for the construction of new thermal power plants in the world is growing, while the development of renewable energy projects is rapidly becoming cheaper.

Funding for thermal power plants projects is becoming more expensive, reflecting the potential risks associated with changes in legislation.

Despite gloomy forecasts, the construction of combined cycle thermal power plants, including gas-fired power plants and innovative integrated gasification combined cycle technology, continues to play an important role in the energy strategy of the United States, China, Russia, India and other countries.

Considering the huge reserves of coal, oil and gas, which will be enough for the energy industry for at least half a century, the energy of fossil fuels continues to be used even in the context of the global energy transition.

Under the new conditions, companies planning to implement fossil fuel energy projects should prioritize the choice of a financial model for a thermal power plant project.

The correct choice of funding sources becomes the key to the viability of such projects in the future.

Bank loan, combined project finance instruments or bond issue?

It is critical to choose the right financial model for a thermal power plant project, the success of which depends on the asset value of the initiators, future cash flows, electricity and fuel prices, demand forecast and other factors. A deep understanding of the market will help you find the most adequate funding for your project.

Securing funding for thermal power plants projects on the world market requires practical experience and cannot be successfully carried out without the qualified assistance of financial consultants. Assuming that the thermal power plant project already has a viable financial model, the next step should be to use the services of one or two international banks with sufficient experience in financing energy projects.

CP Finance UK Finance brings together an international team of professionals providing comprehensive services for medium and large businesses.

We offer project finance services, develop advanced financial models and advise clients on any financial, legal and engineering issues.

Are you looking for a reliable partner for your energy project?

We are ready to act as your general contractor, offering the construction of thermal power plants under an EPC contract.

Contact us anytime with your project details.

Choosing a financing model for a thermal power plants project

When structuring project financing, the lender must adapt the construction contract or EPC contract accordingly.

It must be drafted in such a way that the rights of the initiator in relation to the specified contract can be transferred in favor of the creditors.

A professional analysis of the contract as part of the structuring of the financial model for a thermal power plant is crucial mainly due to the following fundamental aspects:

• The lender or investor must have access to any economic benefit that the issuing company receives under the contract. In case of violation of the terms of the contract, these funds can be used to compensate for losses to the party financing the construction of the thermal power plant.

• The proponent of the project has limited financial obligations to the contractor, which are clearly defined by the contract in such a way as to avoid “overestimating” the project. To minimize risk, it is important to enter into contracts on a “one-time payment” basis.

It is clear that the more predictable the project budget is and the more limited the risk of its increase during the construction phase of the facility, the lower the risk for the investor.

The financial model for a thermal power plant project should be designed in such a way that the parties have the maximum interest in the successful completion of this project. It is obvious that the investor sets the following conditions.

First, the funded project must be completed on time and put into operation on schedule.

Secondly, the investor is interested in not having a significant cost overrun during the construction phase.

If the proponent of the project does not guarantee that the aforementioned points are properly provided for in the construction contract, then there is a risk that potential investors will refuse to participate in the project. If the project is financed through the stock markets, the success of the bond placement cannot be guaranteed under these circumstances.

For these reasons, the participation of professional financial consultants is essential for the correct organization of financing for the construction of a thermal power plant and ensuring acceptable conditions for the implementation of the project, whether it is a new or mature project.

Bank lending for the construction of thermal energy

The successful launch and expansion of any business initiative, including the implementation of large energy projects, requires available sources of financial resources.

Bank loans are a very popular source of capital for acquiring assets, financing operating expenses, and fulfilling contractual obligations to suppliers, contractors, customers and other lenders.

Despite the wide range of available funding sources, the issue of financial provision of the project with bank capital comes to the fore. Funding for thermal power plants projects on bank lending compares favorably with its simplicity compared to alternative financial models.

Despite the rapid development of equity markets, banks are much more important sources of financing for the energy sector.

Investment loans in some regions of the world account for more than half of all capital-intensive energy projects implemented.

Investment loans: An investment loan is a long-term loan provided by a bank or other financial institution to finance investment expenses related to running and developing a business, including the construction of large facilities.

This loan is used to finance investment projects related to the modernization, reconstruction or expansion of the company’s fixed assets.

The funds raised are used to purchase a land plot for construction, build new power units or expand existing facilities, purchase generators, boilers, turbines, conveyors and other equipment.

The loan amount is allocated to the borrowing company in accordance with the individual needs of the project. A loan can be obtained once or, for example, in parts adapted to the schedule of the investment project.

Funding for thermal power plants projects and construction cost of the facilities ranging from $ 600 to $ 1,000 per megawatt, the total project cost can reach several hundred million dollars.

This makes the development of a financial model critical to the success of the project.

The condition for obtaining an investment loan for the construction of a thermal power plant is confirmation of the economic efficiency of this project, as well as the issuance of loan collateral or other reliable guarantees, well-prepared technical documentation and financial plans.

To reduce credit risk, banks often require the borrower to participate in the planned investment project.

Depending on the type of project, the contribution ranges from 10% to 20% of the investment value.

This requirement is based on the assumption that a borrower risking equity capital will be more interested in the success of his investment.

Bank financing or bond issue: important considerations

Choosing a financing model for any capital intensive project is often a dilemma.

Bank loan, project finance or bond issue?

There are many financial and legal reasons in the thermal energy sector that are important to assess in each case.

If the analysis of the financial model and funding for the thermal power plant project showed that it is necessary to take a long-term loan (15 or 20 years), then the international capital market may be a more appropriate solution compared to the traditional bank loan.

With rare exceptions (for example, long-term loans from the International Finance Corporation), the syndicated loan market offers shorter maturities than may be required to finance a TPP project.

On the other hand, bond financing tends to have fairly long maturities with easy setup and restructuring.

For this reason, the financing of the thermal power plant project can be carried out through the issue of bonds. Given the complex nature of the issue, companies need the right financial instruments and professional support to successfully place bonds, especially among international investors.

Bank loans in many cases are simpler and more affordable compared to entering the stock markets or organizing project financing.

However, there are several good reasons to finance a TPP project through international bond markets:

• The company needs large investments, but banks and the local stock market do not have sufficient appetite to finance the project.

• Companies, for certain reasons, are not satisfied with the financing conditions offered by local banks, credit institutions or private investors.

• The project initiator seeks to diversify risk by opening up access to international institutional investors from other parts of the world.

• Placing bonds on the international market makes the TPP project more competitive given the high rates on bank loans and the complexity of organizing project financing.

The choice largely depends on the scale of the project, the supply of fuel (natural gas, coal, fuel oil or possibly biomass), guaranteed demand for electricity, and the availability of strong sponsors with extensive experience in the sector.

It is important to understand that it is more difficult for companies from developing countries to take advantage of certain financial instruments, such as placing bonds on the global market.

The flexibility ofD is considered to be an advantage over bond-based financial models due to the broad opportunities for negotiating with the bank on changing debt repayment schedules, as well as restructuring and refinancing loans.

On the one hand, serious energy projects are carefully planned and studied, including a detailed risk assessment.

On the other hand, the construction of thermal power plants in developing countries carries serious risks that may require a revision of the financing conditions at any time.

This is not easy to do in the case of the issuance of project bonds.

The project initiator must also anticipate future legislative changes, which are rapidly moving towards green energy in many countries. Obtaining government guarantees can secure the project and will help to increase its investment attractiveness.

Project bonds: a new word in energy financing

Recently, project bonds have been actively used to finance capital-intensive projects.

This can be explained by a number of advantageous features of this type of securities that distinguish them from traditional corporate bonds. Borrowed funds raised by placing project bonds are paid from the cash flow generated by the project, but not from the issuer’s current income.

This feature makes project bonds a kind of long-term investment in future projects. Today, project bonds have become very attractive to large financial players looking for stable and long-term investment opportunities.

Such securities are readily purchased by pension funds, large investment funds, as well as insurance companies and other institutional investors.

The concept of project bonds is underdeveloped in some regions of the world, but this method is gradually crowding out traditional debt financing, especially in capital-intensive sectors such as energy, infrastructure and the LNG industry.

An innovative financial model of a thermal power plant project based on the placement of project bonds has a number of advantages for the initiator.

However, some aspects continue to cause debate among entrepreneurs.

The first argument against the use of project bonds to finance large objects is the so-called negative carry.

Its essence lies in the fact that the issuing company receives funds immediately, while the costs of building a power plant are spread over a period of several years.

This leads to a situation where the issuer is forced to regularly pay interest on borrowed funds that are not actually used at a given time. To avoid unnecessary costs, companies should use a special mechanism of deferred payments or issue several series of bonds in accordance with the financial needs of the project.

The second argument in favor of debt financing for the TPP project is limited access to stock markets.

Some companies will not be able to effectively place their bonds on the international market, while the local market is underdeveloped and does not meet the needs of the business.

This problem is especially common in young companies. But on the other hand, such companies rarely undertake the implementation of large energy projects. In addition, small companies with limited assets do not have access to bank loans, turning to project finance instruments.

Despite a number of controversial issues, project bonds are widely used for funding for thermal power plants projects and construction of the facilities and other large energy projects.

Since such projects are characterized by very high and stable incomes, which are guaranteed by long-term agreements, investors’ appetite for purchasing project bonds is high today.

Project finance (PF) for thermal power plants

The term “project finance” means funding a thermal power plants from internal financial resources and (or) borrowed funds provided against future cash flows, but not against the assets of the company that initiated the project.

Thus, the potential return on investment and risks largely depend on an accurate and reasonable assessment of a particular project by the investor.

Project finance (PF) is widely used in the energy sector due to the attraction of large investments on an off-balance sheet basis.

Thanks to the competent implementation of this financial model for the TPP project, companies can simultaneously build several large facilities without burdening their financial statements with a huge debt.

In most cases, partners create a dedicated project company, whose assets serve as collateral and its future cash flows are used to service debt.

Banks in this case provide about 70-80% of the project cost, but some financial institutions offer to finance 90% of the project and even the full cost.

The complex structure of the contractual relationship in the framework of project finance contributes to the optimal distribution of project risks between the parties who can best cope with these risks. Consequently, the organization of the PF, along with a detailed analysis of the project, requires multi-stage negotiations and time-consuming legal work.

Regardless of the project type and funding method, partners will make a decision to participate based on implementation risks and expected income.

The financing structure, collateral and other points depend on the specific case.

The cost of arranging project finance (fixed costs) is considered to be higher than traditional debt finance models of a thermal power plant project. In this regard, the PF can be used only for the implementation of large investment projects, estimated at tens of millions of euros.

Most often, project finance is used for the construction of large-scale facilities that require expensive R&D, engineering, as well as technically complex construction and the purchase of expensive equipment.

Until recently, project finance was considered quite risky, but in the mid-2000s, a number of economic studies appeared that confirm the significant advantages of PF instruments over traditional corporate lending in a number of investment projects.

This financing method has been used for the construction of numerous thermal power plants, substations and power lines in the United States, Latin America, Africa, Europe, as well as in East Asia, the Middle East and other regions of the world.

CP Finance UK Finance is ready to offer long-term bank funding for thermal power plants projects on attractive terms.

We also arrange project finance for the construction of thermal power plants around the world, providing a full range of financial, legal and engineering services for energy companies.

Advantages of project finance

Project finance is chosen by energy companies due to several principal advantages, listed below:

• Non-recourse or limited recourse financing.
• Off-balance sheet financing of the project.
• High share of borrowed funds in the project, reaching 90%.
• Absence of strict restrictions in the contract.
• Isolated financing, where SPV acts as a borrower.
• Potential tax benefits.
• Minimization of risks.

To better understand the advantages of project funding of thermal power plants, below we describe in more detail about each of these aspects.

Any combination of the above aspects is sufficient for sponsors to consider the project finance method as optimal for project implementation.

But the most important benefits of the PF for the initiator include limited recourse and off-balance sheet financing through the creation of an independent project company.

If you are interested in project finance for thermal power plants, contact the CP Finance UK Finance financial team. Together with our European partners, we have implemented numerous energy projects in more than 30 countries around the world, so we are ready to use our experience and business contacts to promote your business.

Our services in financing the construction of thermal power plants

CP Finance UK Finance, an international financial company, has served private companies and government customers for over a quarter of a century.

We provide loans, project financing in the energy sector, provide loan guarantees, as well as offer investment engineering services, financial model development and consulting.

The geography of CP Finance UK Finance services covers almost the whole world: USA, China, Mexico, France, Germany, Spain, UAE, Argentina, Brazil, Venezuela, South Africa and other countries. Extensive international experience and deep understanding of the energy sector guarantee the high performance of our solutions.

Our team with partners carries out engineering design, construction and modernization of coal and gas thermal power plants of various types.

CP Finance UK Finance offers advanced integrated solutions for industrial customers.

If you are looking for a reliable financial partner or general contractor, please contact us.

CP Finance UK FINANCE LIMITED
Website:https://c-pfinanceuk.com/
E-mail:finance@cpuk-financeltd.com
Alt-Email:admin@cpukfinanceltd.com

Energy sectors Project finance ( in the  is driving innovation and the green transition, providing reliable power generation and gradually reducing the carbon footprint of the global economy.

Project finance schemes are enabling an increasing number of companies to switch to renewable energy sources such as wind farms, photovoltaic plants, biogas power plants and others.

At the same time, access to high financial leverage facilitates the implementation of large conventional energy projects as a bridge to a sustainable future, including the modernization of coal-fired thermal power plants, the construction of gas-fired combined cycle thermal power plants and other facilities.

It is becoming increasingly difficult for companies specializing in energy projects to implement capital-intensive projects without a high share of equity capital, especially against the backdrop of increasingly tight regulation in the banking sector.

Innovative project finance mechanisms, long-term investment loans, mezzanine capital, reliable loan guarantees and comprehensive consulting support allow our clients to implement large energy projects with 90% debt financing.

Contact CP Finance UK Finance to find out more.

Project finance in the renewable energy sector

Project finance refers to a method of raising long-term debt financing for large projects through financial engineering tools based on loans provided against the future cash flow generated by the project.

A distinctive feature of project finance is the participation of the SPV (special purpose vehicle), which is engaged in attracting the resources necessary for the implementation of the investment project, ensures its construction and makes payments on loans issued to energy sectors project finance  from the funds received through energy generation.

Securing the return of borrowed funds attracted to finance an investment project is the cash flow generated by the project. In addition, assets created during the implementation of the RES project can be provided as collateral. In other words, PF schemes do not require sponsors to provide their assets to ensure the return of received borrowed funds at the initial stage of the investment stage of the project. This makes project finance a fairly risky tool for capital providers.

Project finance in renewable energy is characterized by the following features:

• Comprehensive analysis of projects.
• Rational sharing of risks between project stakeholders.
• High requirements for the margin of safety of projects.
• Tender approach to the selection of suppliers and contractors.
• Complex contract structure of RES projects.
• Strict monitoring and control at all stages.

An important aspect of the implementation of energy projects, in addition to technology development, is the diversification of financing sources, in particular, the issuance of various types of securities.

The evolution of the financial market over the past decades has led to an increase in interest and the formation of a high demand for project finance bonds, opening up wide opportunities for financing renewable energy projects.

It has become profitable for commercial banks to refinance long-term investment loans in the bond market through the additional issuance of PF bonds or securitization.

At a certain point, the assets of the renewable energy sectors project finance had one of the highest potentials for securitization.

Starting around 2015, financial market participants began to actively use green bonds, which allowed energy companies to finance renewable energy assets by issuing bonds, the proceeds of which are directed to projects or activities with environmental goals. The growth in renewable energy funding has had a positive impact on the construction of photovoltaic power plants, offshore wind farms and other environmentally friendly energy projects in Europe and beyond.

Solar power plants

For project finance, solar energy projects are more suitable than wind generation projects, which are considered more technically complex and risky.

The commissioning of new photovoltaic power plants creates significant potential for the issuance of project finance bonds in the field of solar generation around the world. The specificity of solar energy technologies is such that continued investment in this sector is accompanied by a significant reduction in the cost of technologies and an increase in the competitiveness of the energy produced due to economies of scale.

Skyrocketing prices for natural gas, fuel oil and coal, caused by geopolitical tensions on the European continent in 2021-2022, are also boosting investor interest in energy sectors project finance.

It is one of the most well-studied and predictable sources of energy, making entire industries independent of fossil fuels.

Thanks to changes in the fossil fuel market and active support from governments, energy sectors project finance  has become very attractive.

Compared to other renewable energy facilities, solar energy projects are the most typical from an engineering point of view, since the technologies and equipment used in the construction of solar power plants are largely identical in projects implemented around the world. Low risk and predictable performance are some of the reasons why project finance models are extremely widespread in the construction of solar power plants.

Today, there are dozens of large solar power plants of various types around the world built using project finance.

Among them we can mention Benban Solar Park (Egypt), Noor Power Plant (Morocco) and others. Major financial institutions and companies such as Acciona Energy are actively involved in the development of innovative solar projects, making an invaluable contribution to the energy transition.

Wind farms

Project finance, being one of the priority tools for stimulating economic growth, allows the implementation of large-scale wind projects such as the construction of offshore wind farms.

The latter, having enormous development potential, are considered as one of the main sources of green energy for coastal regions, in particular for European consumers near the North Sea and the Baltic Seas. This is confirmed by the achievements of Germany, Denmark, Poland and other countries.

In Germany, using the project finance tool, the Nordsee ONE and Butendiek wind park projects were successfully implemented.

For their implementation, independent companies were established, the purpose of which was the development, financing, construction and operation of wind farms.

For example, Nordsee One GmbH was established for the Nordsee ONE park, while Western Power Distribution became the co-owner, operator and developer of the Butendiek wind farm.

International experience shows that global climate issues and rising fossil fuel prices are leading to an increase in project finance activity in the wind energy industry, especially in Europe and North America. The trend towards increased use of project finance schemes in the EU can be largely attributed to government programs, in particular targeted efforts to attract investment in renewable energy sources.

These government efforts are complemented by leading wind turbine manufacturers such as Siemens Gamesa and Vestas, who are investing hundreds of millions of euros to improve equipment capacity, reliability and reliability.

Hydropower plants

The top ten countries in terms of installed hydropower capacity remain unchanged over a long period of time.

China, Brazil, Canada, USA, Russia, India, Norway, Turkey, Japan and France remain the leaders, together accounting for more than two-thirds of the world’s installed capacity. These are countries that, due to the abundance of water resources, are able to develop hydropower projects on a sufficient scale and with high economic efficiency.

However, there are fewer and fewer suitable sites for new HPPs, which, along with tightening technical requirements, increases the cost of engineering and construction of such facilities.

Due to financial and technical reasons, hydropower is inferior in terms of investment attractiveness to other sources of renewable energy, especially solar and wind energy. This has a negative impact on the investment in the industry.

Between 2015 and 2019, the global average annual growth in installed hydropower capacity was 2.1%, which is considered a very modest figure. The need for increased funding for hydropower projects is felt almost everywhere, from greenfield projects to capital-intensive modernization of existing HPPs.

Energy sectors project finance has traditionally played a critical role in this sector due to the huge initial costs and long payback periods of such projects.

Few companies, even in partnership with government organizations, are willing to bear such costs without external support.

The cost of building a hydropower plant varies widely, depending on the specific location and natural conditions, the technology used and the scale of the project.

Previously, such facilities could build about 500,000 euros per 1 MW of installed capacity, but now the construction of hydroelectric power plants in hard-to-reach river sections in compliance with the strictest environmental requirements can easily exceed 4 million euros per 1 MW of installed capacity.

The establishment of a special purpose vehicle, isolation of project assets from its initiators, high financial leverage and rational distribution of project risks create the most favorable conditions for attracting financing for the construction of hydropower plants in the current environment.

Project finance in the conventional energy sector

Thermal power plants at the initial stage of construction are generally considered to be a cheaper solution compared to energy sectors project finance of similar installed capacity.

However, the exorbitant prices of natural, gas and coal make these plants quite costly to operate, so the cost of electricity produced can rise substantially during times when fossil fuel supplies are scarce. As a controversial energy source with an uncertain future, conventional energy facilities are now considered risky investments, which explains the difficulty of financing such projects.

Since thermal power plants are directly dependent on the availability of fossil fuels, in many cases these facilities are built near energy sources such as coal fields, liquefied natural gas terminals, large pipelines, refineries, and so on. Usually these are very large projects with an installed capacity of 1 to 3 GW or more, consisting of several multi-megawatt power units and a developed infrastructure.

The cost of such facilities can run into many hundreds of millions of euros, which poses serious long-term financing problems for sponsors.

Project finance is now widely used in the thermal power industry, providing companies with the effect of high financial leverage and convenient financing mechanisms with minimal risk.

Some features of PF model are listed below:

• Flexible application of a wide range of financial mechanisms, including long-term investment loans, the issuance of corporate securities and others.

• Using future financial flows as collateral for debt, as well as providing assets of a special project company created as part of a specific thermal power plant project as collateral.

• Energy project financing is carried out through a specially established legal entity (SPV, SPE, SPC), which is formally independent of the initiators and has separate assets.

• Adequate level of financial participation of the project sponsors, which can reach 10-20% of the estimated project cost or more, depending on the agreements. Thus, 80-90% of project costs are covered by banks / investors, which allows using the effect of financial leverage.

• Given the complete absence of collateral or its limited nature, the reliability of the PF model is ensured by a complex multilateral contractual structure with a rational distribution of risks and responsibilities of the parties.

In fact, the project finance (PF) is justified only by the high reliability of the project and the high confidence in the technologies, which can be achieved with sufficient experience and professional approach of the contractors.

Obviously, this is much more applicable to traditional energy sources than to little-studied alternative technologies.

Combined cycle power plants

Project finance, based on the repayment of project debts from future cash flows, has been considered for several decades as one of the best solutions for conventional energy facilities.

This is especially true when it comes to large capital-intensive projects built on proven and reliable low-risk technologies. Highly efficient and reliable Combined Cycle Gas Turbine (CCGT) power plants are now considered mainstream in the thermal power sector. This is an area where the potential benefits of project finance models are fully realized.

World experience in the construction and operation of thermal power plants has shown that the generation of electricity and heat at them is most effective in combined-cycle gas turbine power plants, which include a gas turbine and a steam turbine.

As a result of this combination, the heat is fed into the gas turbine (the cycle at a high initial temperature of the combined system), and the unused heat is removed to the steam turbine, which operates at a relatively low temperature.

This technology provides the maximum efficiency that can be achieved by burning fossil fuels.

As an important bridge between conventional energy and a carbon-free future, gas turbine combined cycle power plants powered by natural gas are now regarded as one of the most important sources of electricity for industry and households in developed countries.

Despite the problems caused by the explosive growth in hydrocarbon prices, highly-efficient CCGT projects continue to be seen as one of the pillars of the global economy for the coming decades.

Project finance plays an important role in modernizing and improving the efficiency of the European energy sector, supporting local economies against the backdrop of rising hydrocarbon prices. One example is the recent 560MW CCGT plant project in Grudziadz, which is being developed jointly with MYTILINEOS and Siemens Energy Global GmbH.

The power plant, an EPC contract for the construction of which has been signed since May 2022, will be financed through a special purpose vehicle on a PF basis.

Modernization of coal-fired thermal power plants

Risk management and project finance is an important element financing method based on the distribution of risks among the participants.

This issue is especially relevant for large projects based on innovative technologies, which carry the greatest risk for potential investors and lenders.

CP Finance UK Finance offers long-term financing for projects around the world, including loan guarantees.

We offer professional customer support at all stages of investment, including professional planning and risk management in project finance.

The concept of risk in project finance

Risk management in project finance is one of the most important elements of project management.

While much attention has been devoted to describing the various types of risk in the project finance literature, the definition of risk itself has been largely ignored. In its most simplified form, risk can mean a threat to the implementation of plans.

However, such a general definition has the disadvantage that it is difficult to draw conclusions about the nature of the risk and the type of risk based on it.

In the case of investments in the securities market, the measure of risk is the dispersion of predicted or empirically observed results in relation to the expected level. A commonly used synthetic risk measure defined in this way is the standard deviation. The disadvantage of this risk measure is that it takes into account both negative and positive deviations from the expected value, in connection with which the concept of semi-deviation was introduced, which takes into account only those situations that have a negative impact on the result of the project.

Both standard deviation and semi-deviation require a large amount of data to obtain reliable results.

Due to the significant differences between individual investment projects, it is difficult to find comparable historical data that could be used to assess the risk of each new project.

The only way out in this situation is the expert method and modeling of various scenarios and their chances, as well as sensitivity analysis. The use of these methods makes it possible, for example, to compare two projects in terms of the impact of interest rate risk on the final effect of the project.

At the same time, the complexity of the projects does not allow for a deep study of all the factors that affect the final result of the investment project. There are threats here that cannot be quantified. This happens, for example, when the implementation of the project is under threat due to the lack of appropriate qualifications of management personnel. It is impossible to estimate in advance either the potential losses that may arise as a result of inefficient management, or the likelihood of such a situation occurring.

There is no doubt, that large companies need to protect themselves from such a threat, and from this point of view, this is an element of risk management.

It is assumed that a risk can be considered when the chance of an event affecting the outcome of a project is known. When this chance is unknown, we are dealing with a decision-making situation under conditions of uncertainty. However, the goal of risk management in project finance is not so much to quantify all risks, but to accurately identify areas of threat and develop effective methods to protect against them.

Based on these considerations, a general definition of risk can be adopted.

Risk in project finance can be viewed as the possibility of a situation or event that has a specific negative impact on the financial result of an investment project.

There are several implications of this definition of risk.

First of all, we are talking about the possibility, not the probability of a certain situation.

This approach not only allows the inclusion of non-quantifiable hazards in the analysis, but also has a significant impact on the risk testing methodology.

In the case of project finance, the emphasis is on qualitative rather than quantitative description of threats. Among other things, the so-called risk classification. This is a grouping of project risks into classes and a subsequent risk assessment of each risk group. If a comprehensive and unified risk classification and comparable risk measures are used, the result of the analysis will be a complete picture of the risks associated with the project.

Another distinguishing feature of risk is that it covers the possibility of only such an event that has a specific financial impact on the investment project. For example, in the case of the construction of a cement plant, the element of risk will not be a fall in demand for concrete, but a possible fall in prices caused by it. With a simultaneous decrease in the supply of gasoline on the market, factories can sell all products at a constant price, despite the decrease in demand.

Another important feature of the aforementioned concept of risk is that only those events that have a negative impact on the finances of the project are taken into account. It is not the fluctuation of the exchange rate itself that is an element of risk, but its changes, leading to a decrease in project income or an increase in project costs.

This distinguishes the concept of risk management in project finance from the simple equation of risk with variability in outcomes that occurs in many areas.

Corporate finance vs project finance

Due to the large scale of investment projects covered by the project finance, as well as the long payback periods of these investments, most of these projects are characterized by high risk.

For these reasons, the rational sharing of risks management among project finance participants is considered to be the most important advantage of this method of investment financing.

In the case of a traditional investment loan, the borrower is liable to the bank with its assets and thus assumes all the risk associated with the project. Both banks and other lenders, in order to minimize the risk associated with issued loans, often require collateral that significantly exceeds the value of loans issued. Thus, lenders increase their chances of getting their money back in case of failure of the investment project or financial difficulties of the debtor.

The situation is different with project finance.

Due to the scale of projects and their isolation from sponsors, the assets of a special purpose vehicle (SPV) are usually not enough to repay the debt. For this reason, lenders have to look for alternative ways to secure their financial interests.

These may be guarantees from large financial institutions or other parties involved in the project.

There are two basic forms of project finance:

• Non-recourse financing.
• Limited recourse financing.

Although one of the main benefits of project finance is to reduce the risk of sponsors, non-recourse financing in its purest form is extremely rare.

In such a case, the project proponents would only be liable to the extent of their contributions to the capital of SPV, and the lenders would bear a very high risk. For this reason, limited recourse financing is most commonly used. This provides a reasonable level of risk for lenders, which will be lower than with traditional financing methods.

Some experts mention full recourse financing, but this method differs little from traditional debt financing. Regardless of the extent to which the obligations of the project sponsors are guaranteed, the principle of risk sharing transfers some of the risk that usually falls on the project initiators to other participants.

There are three levels of risk sharing that can be distinguished here:

1. The large scale of projects implemented under project finance schemes usually involves the presence of several sponsors. By creating a separate entity in which each of the sponsors has a certain share, they share the risk associated with this project among themselves.

2. The risk is shared between the sponsors and the SPV implementing the project and the entities providing external capital. Lenders waive traditional guarantees, and are limited to project assets. Certain part of the risk associated with the failure of the project, the delay in debt repayment or the need for additional financing, is assumed by lenders.

3. Both project initiators/sponsors and lenders try to minimize their risk by transferring it to third parties. Potential risk areas are analyzed and project finance participants that have the greatest impact on minimizing a certain type of risk are identified, after which they are made responsible for managing this risk. For example, to minimize the risk of delaying commissioning, contractors must ensure that work is completed on time.

The introduction of project finance schemes is excellent for risk management, which is of great importance in the case of large investment projects, the failure of which means huge losses for both their initiators/sponsors and lenders.

Due to the isolation of the project from the structures of its initiators, it is relatively easy to identify and manage areas of potential risk. This allows companies to implement projects with a relatively high level of risk, which they previously did not dare to.

On the other hand, the additional risk to the lenders makes the project finance more expensive due to the higher risk premium.

Project finance is a method that allows such contracts to be structured on a case-by-case basis where each participant bears an acceptable level of risk.

Moreover, the rational division of risks between the most competent participants leads to a decrease in the overall risk level of the project.

For example, burdening a construction contractor with the consequences of delaying the commissioning of a building will force him to do everything to prevent this from happening. The capital provider, for example, has no such influence on the construction schedule, and therefore cannot influence the risk sufficiently.

Types of risks at different stages of the project

A large number of risks associated with projects and their diversification cause problems with classification.

Depending on the purpose of the risk analysis, they can be classified according to different criteria. In PF, insured risks, bank risks, and sponsor risks are often distinguished.

While insurance risk is easy to separate, the division between bank risk and sponsor risk is highly variable. While banks try to minimize exposure to other types of risk besides credit risk, in the case of project finance they tend to take on most of the risks traditionally borne by business owners. Moreover, it is rare that only one project participant bears a certain type of risk. Typically, risks are distributed in such a way that each participant has an acceptable level of risk.

Another proposed risk classification is the separation of internal and external threats. This classification is difficult in practice for two reasons.

First, he does not clearly separate the causes and characteristics of these two groups of risks, as well as the tools for managing them.

Secondly, it causes significant difficulties in classifying certain risks.

For example, the risk of cost overruns is classified as an internal risk, but one possible reason for cost overruns is changes in regulations requiring the purchase of equipment that meets more stringent standards (external).

Groups of risks with similar characteristics can usually be minimized using similar tools, so this classification greatly facilitates the development of a risk management strategy and is an excellent starting point for further risk analysis.

Due to the complexity of risk classification in project finance, a single universal scheme has not yet been developed.

This classification is used quite often, but there is no consensus among financial experts regarding a more detailed classification of risks within these three groups.

This classification covers all the most important types of risks arising from the implementation of investment projects based on project finance. It also groups risks so that appropriate tools can be selected to manage each of the identified risk groups.

It is worth mentioning the classification of risks by phases of the investment project. This is extremely useful from a risk management and project finance point of view and is often used in practice to prepare appropriate strategies for each stage of an investment project.

Modern approach to risk management in project finance

The state of uncertainty is inconvenient for all participants in investment projects.

The higher the risk, the higher the probability of business failure and loss of invested funds. At the same time, there is increasing pressure from lenders to pay higher risk compensation. This increases the cost of the project, and high risk is often the reason for abandoning it.

There are many methods, schemes, models and tools to reduce the uncertainty associated with the investment process.

Risk management in project finance consists of analyzing information about potential threats, and taking active steps to counter them.

These areas are not independent, but complement each other. Analysis of risk information allows the project team to assess whether the level of risk is acceptable or mitigation measures are needed. On the other hand, risk cannot be managed without continuous monitoring of the consequences of the actions taken. Therefore, continuous collection of risk information is essential for effective risk management in project finance.

Therefore, risk management is not a one-time activity performed during the planning phase of a project. At this stage, it is necessary to carefully analyze the risks of the project and develop ways to deal with them. At the same time, it is critical to constantly monitor the situation and adjust the risk management strategy in accordance with the changing situation.

The risk management process can be represented as follows:

1. Identification of risk areas.
2. Determining the threat posed by the different types of risk.
3. Choice of strategies and tools of risk management.
4. Implementation of the chosen strategy.
5. Monitoring and control of project results.

In a complex investment project, it is not easy to renegotiate contracts between participants, but there are a number of tools that can be used to manage risks in the investment process.

This can be, for example, additional insurance or swaps. Their number is not limited, and their use depends on the experience and qualifications of the project team. The main risk management tools in project finance will be presented below.

The template use of one tool helps to protect against any risk only in rare cases. For this reason, several options are usually used, and the risks are shared among the participants. For example, a special purpose vehicle can reduce risk by using non-combustible materials in the construction of the facility. This will reduce the threats associated with fire.

However, SPV can pass on some of the fire risk to the insurance company by purchasing a policy.

In some cases, the interests of individual project finance participants seem to conflict with the interests of the project as a whole.

For example, shifting foreign exchange risk to lenders is contrary to their desire to minimize their risk. On the other hand, banks are best prepared to work with financial instruments, so taking on the management of cash flows in various currencies is optimal from the point of view of the project, as it minimizes the likelihood of losses associated with incorrect financial decisions.

It should be emphasized that both methods of risk management, risk minimization and risk sharing, are equally important, since the main goal of risk management in project finance is to structure the project in such a way that each participant bears an acceptable risk while minimizing the risk of the project as a whole.

Risk management in Project finance is characterized by a broad understanding of project management.

Risk minimization methods include not only classical instruments, such as, for example, insurance policies, swaps or guarantees, but also all actions aimed at reducing the risk of certain situations.

This includes proper project design, hiring experienced engineers and operators, or the aforementioned use of non-combustible materials in construction.

Risk of depletion of natural resources

This is a risk inherent in projects aimed at the extraction or processing of natural resources (mining and processing plants, quarries, mines, cement plants, etc.).

Such projects are often carried out using the PF method, and therefore this risk is considered an important element of project management.

If the mineral reserves turn out to be less than predicted, there is a serious threat to the continuation of the entire investment project. Under extremely unfavorable circumstances, too small deposits can lead to a situation in which the operating profit of the project will not be enough to repay the debt.

On the other hand, the deposit may turn out to be of much worse quality than expected. This results not only in a lower sale price, but also in higher extraction costs, which can also increase the loan repayment period. Similarly, more inaccessible deposits require higher extraction costs and more time to exploit.

The risk of depleting reserves could lead to the threat of timely debt service and force creditors to reduce subsequent tranches and change the terms of financing.

In the worst case, the SPV may be unable to repay its debts as a result of unsuccessful operating activities.

The following are some of the risk management and project finance tools:

• Choosing an experienced operator.
• Conducting independent research.
• Financing flexibility.
• Sponsor guarantees.

While this risk is typical of the business activities of project sponsors, banks often take on some of this risk.

Financing projects to develop mineral deposits is a highly profitable but high-risk activity. For this reason, banks involved in projects of this type do so with the utmost care and make every effort to minimize the uncertainty that accompanies each project.

Operational risks

This is another technical risk, but it only occurs during the operational phase of the project.

As already mentioned, each project phase is characterized by a different risk management strategy.

During the operational stage, collateral and most of the safeguards used in earlier phases of the project are no longer valid.

For these reasons, debt repayment depend on the facility’s operating performance. Both technical (equipment failures, infrastructure problems) and economic (fuel prices), as well as organizational and other problems can affect the business.

If the production is lower than expected, the revenue is also lower, which may threaten the timely payment of the debt. Similarly, poor quality can lead to lower prices and marketing problems. On the other hand, high production costs reduce operating income, which also negatively affects the SPV’s ability to service debt.

The most important reasons for operational risk include the following:

• Implementation of innovative, untested technologies.
• Errors in the design and construction of structures and devices.
• Low quality products and the use of cheap materials.
• Wear and tear of machines and equipment.
• Improper operation and maintenance.
• Low infrastructure efficiency.

In the case of project finance, this risk is very important, because projects implemented with this method are often so large and technologically complex that even experienced teams of engineers have problems with predicting threats to the proper operation of their projects.

Nevertheless, the operational risk can be reduced and shifted to other project participants.

Some tools for risk management:

• Right choice of technology.
• Selection of experienced contractors.
• Independent technological expertise.
• Contractor’s guarantees.
• Sponsor guarantees.
• Investment support.
• Insurance.

Financial risks

Financial risk is an integral element of any investment project.

Due to the large scale of projects, high debt, and significant cash flows that accompany project finance, this risk can have a significant impact on the success of a project and its ability to repay debt.

This group includes inflation risk, currency risk, and interest rate risk. Serious threats posed by the financial risk to the project require a comprehensive analysis and development of appropriate tools to manage these risks.

These tools include, among others:

• Fixed interest rates.
• Balancing cash flows.
• Interest rate swaps.
• Foreign exchange swaps.
• Currency options.
• Forward contracts

Refinancing risks

This is a specific group of risks, since it mainly concerns lenders, while collateral and refinancing risks can be transferred to other entities to a very limited extent.

Collateral risk is a typical credit risk. Each bank carefully examines the collateral for a loan before making a decision on its issuance. However, the basis for granting a loan is the solvency of the borrower, and the collateral is only a type of guarantee for the return of invested funds in case of financial problems of the borrower.

Risk management in project finance focuses on the project’s ability to repay debt with expected cash flows.

Collateral is a secondary element of credit risk minimization and is usually not of sufficient value to cover liabilities to the bank.

This can be explained not only by the nature of project finance, but also by the high specialization of investments made using this method.

Changes in the value of collateral can have many reasons, including instability of commercial law, borrower’s actions leading to a decrease in the value of assets, and the situation on a given market. In practice, lenders have very little influence on the collateral risk in the case of project finance.

For example, it is impossible to force SPV, to provide more liquid assets, because the company only has limited assets needed to implement a given project.

This risk can be managed to a limited extent by the following tools:

• Collateral valuation.
• Guarantees and security system.
• Involvement of a legal advisor.

Since the impact of force majeure on the project cannot be prevented, the management of this risk is focused on providing ex post coverage of losses and is very limited.

If you are interested in project finance, please contact CP Finance UK Finance.

Our experienced financial team is ready to offer you customized solutions for any project, including professional risk management and consulting support from planning to the operation stage.

CP Finance UK FINANCE LIMITED
Website:https://c-pfinanceuk.com/
E-mail:finance@cpuk-financeltd.com
Alt-Email:admin@cpukfinanceltd.com

Global investment in the energy sector in 2020 decreased by about $ 400 billion compared to 2019, while Financing of electrical substations amounting to just over $ 1,500 billion.

An electrical substation is a key node in a power system where energy is converted to adequate voltage levels for transport, distribution or consumption.

The development of any sector of the economy that consumes electrical energy, be it heavy industry or mining, requires additional investment in the construction of electrical substations and other elements of the power system.

Growing competition requires businesses to implement more efficient solutions in various areas, including generation, transformation and transmission of energy.

In recent years, companies in the power sector around the world have been challenged to implement new technological developments at their facilities to improve customer power services while striving for better quality and price conditions. The cost of electrical substations is also rising, given the stringent requirements for energy quality, safety and facility automation.

CP Finance UK FINANCE, a financial specialists perform a full range of works on the design and calculation of technical and economic parameters of electrical systems and networks, including the development of individual energy projects for power plants, industrial facilities, transport hubs, and so on.

We offer financing for electrical substations and construction of the facilities in Europe, the USA, Latin America, North Africa, the Middle East, as well as in the countries of South and East Asia.

The offerings of our finance company include the organization of project finance (PF), long-term investment loans and much more.

Determination of the cost of financing an electrical substations

Engineering design and financial calculations of electrical systems are based on a detailed analysis and feasibility study of the initial parameters and data collected at the pre-investment research stage.

The chosen option for the implementation of the electrical substation project should ensure the supply of energy to consumers with the lowest investment costs while maintaining optimal quality, reliability and flexibility of the facility.

Multi-stage work to determine the cost of financing an electrical substations includes the search for structures, equipment, materials and methods for their connection, which ensure the achievement of the planned economic indicators of the project with the obligatory compliance with the technical standards of the host country. These works should be an important part of all projects for the construction, modernization, expansion or reconstruction of electrical systems of any scale.

After the approval of a specific list of equipment, materials and technical solutions, our technicians begin stage-by-stage work on the development of technical documentation.

At the same time, the CP Finance UK Finance legal team is working to obtain the necessary approvals from local authorities, licensing authorities, representatives of electricity supplier companies, etc.

The electrical substations planning stage usually includes, but is not limited to:

• Analysis of the existing power system of the region including determination of its load, regulation conditions, as well as the potential for further development.

• Assessment of the requirements of key consumers to ensure optimal operating conditions for the equipment and substantiation of the parameters of the future power substation.

• Analysis of the parameters of the connected power plants and the selection of suitable operating modes for each facility to ensure their balance and dynamic stability.

• Performing professional calculations of power grid operating modes in order to develop an optimal scheme of electrical equipment including transformers, automation, protection systems, compensating devices and other units.

• Estimation of the required costs, including the purchase of materials and equipment, site preparation and the cost of professional services, including the services of construction contractors, independent consultants, etc.

• Preparation of a detailed report with technical and economic indicators of the future system, stages of construction, funding requirements.

The engineering design and financing of electrical substations in general covers an extremely wide range of practical issues.

Along with a systematic approach, which should be aimed at solving strategic business problems, the engineering team is faced with numerous narrow technical problems, such as the most rational choice of protection and automation devices.

There are many techniques used to estimate project costs in the early stages of development. These methods, widely used in areas such as electrical engineering, include Phased Estimating, Multi-Element Estimating, Factoring Estimating, and Parametric Estimating, among others.

In general, the cost of electrical substations today can reach several tens of millions of euros, which depends on the type of facility, capacity, location, the degree of technical complexity of the project and a number of other factors.

The schedule of financing  for the electrical substations and the amount of funds received at each stage of construction should be drawn up individually, taking into account the conditions of a specific project and the requirements of stakeholders.

Factors affecting the cost of an electrical substation

When starting the engineering design of an electrical substations, it is necessary to clearly define its place in the power system, to determine the function that it should perform today and tomorrow.

When determining the parameters of a substation under construction, it is important to clarify the investment efficiency indicators. Investment decisions are made on the basis of analytical information obtained from various sources.

The cost-benefit principle states that value is created when the benefit of a solution exceeds its cost.

The financial cost of the construction of an electrical substation is formed under the influence of the following three variables:

• Cash flow of the investment project.
• Time of project implementation from idea to commissioning.
• Risks and uncertainties associated with the project.

Any financial decisions made by project initiators and investors are closely related to the value of money over time.

The money received the next year is worth more than the same amount when it was received in the fifth or tenth year of construction. Most financial decisions made at the large business level must take into account the change in the value of money over time.

The most important factors affecting the cost of financing an electrical substations are the type of facility and its location in the system.

Finding the optimal solution is often difficult and requires deep economic and technical analysis.

When choosing a specific technical solution for a substation, several factors are taken into account, such as the location of the substation and the length of the associated low voltage circuits, the type and layout of the site, the characteristics of medium and low voltage networks for connection.

Both investment and operating costs are taken into account when preparing an engineering project. The costs of construction of a substation, power lines and installations constitute the main costs incurred from the moment of making a decision on construction until the moment of putting this substation into operation. Operating costs mainly include the cost of purchasing electricity, maintenance, repairs and energy losses. The exact proportions of these costs differ for each project.

It is worth analyzing these costs not only at the construction stage, but also in the context of the long-term operation of the facility.

The substation should be designed in such a way as to ensure the appropriate quality of electricity supplied to consumers at the lowest possible cost. The power quality is determined, among other things, by the level of voltage harmonics, frequency, symmetry of the supply voltages. The substation must be flexible, that is, it must easily adapt to connecting new loads or increasing existing loads. It should also be simple and safe to use.

Factors affecting the cost of an electrical substation are listed below:

• The location of the substation and the length of the MV and LV circuits connected to it, which should be as short as possible.

• The type and design features of the facility that directly affect the use of space and the requirements for the site and premises.

• The power of the step-down transformer in relation to the existing or anticipated future electrical load.

• Investor requirements and operating conditions governing the selection of electrical equipment and ancillary installations.

The investment costs of a substation and transmission line spent during the construction and installation period represent any costs incurred from the moment the decision was made to build a given facility until its normal operation.

Investment costs include the following:

• Material costs (transformer equipment, protection systems, line conductors, supports, cables, fittings and other elements and materials).

• Costs related to construction (operation of equipment used in the construction of the substation, planning of works and hiring of personnel).

• Design and administrative costs (eg development of project documentation, obtaining official building permits).

Operating costs include the following:

• Costs for the purchase of electricity, as well as associated costs to cover energy losses (the latter depend on the resistivity of cables, expected power and consumer demand for electricity).

• Costs associated with the maintenance, repair and maintenance of an existing electrical substation and its equipment.

• The cost of a system failure (in other words, the cost of undelivered energy). The cost of energy not delivered as a result of equipment failures is determined based on the failure rate, taking into account the average number of failures per year and the average duration of failures.

Based on the experience of numerous implemented industrial and energy projects, our professional team can compare alternative options for the construction of electrical substations, choosing the optimal solution for the customer.

The financing of electrical substations requires in-depth knowledge and experience due to the numerous technical and economic factors affecting a project.

For example, the location of the substation close to energy consumers allows to reduce the cross-section of wires due to less voltage drop at a distance. This, on the one hand, reduces investment costs, however, reducing the cross-section of the wires in this case increases the operating energy losses.

When placing transformer equipment inside the premises where energy consumers are located, there is no need for the construction of an overhead power transmission line.

The disadvantage of this option is the need to allocate the appropriate equipped space, which may be associated with additional investment.

When choosing the design of the future electrical substation, our engineering team must find a balanced approach to parameters such as efficiency, loss rate, safety, access and ease of use, compact design, equipment size and weight, initial investment and maintenance costs. The final decision always rests with the investor.

When making calculations for large capital-intensive projects carried out over several years, financiers take into account discounting formulas that translate future flows into current values.

Need more information?
Are you looking for professional assistance in the implementation of your investment project?

Contact CP Finance UK FINANCE LIMITED for details.

Contact us for more information.

CP Finance UK FINANCE LIMITED
Website:https://c-pfinanceuk.com/
E-mail:finance@cpuk-financeltd.com
Alt-Email:admin@cpukfinanceltd.com

Large power plant construction cost are the backbone of the energy system, providing uninterrupted power supply to residential buildings, industrial consumers and infrastructure.

Despite its high social importance, large power plant construction should be profitable and attractive to investors.

This takes into account both the initial investment costs associated with the construction and the operating costs that the owners of the facility will incur over the years.

Any power plant, be it a wind farm, a hydroelectric power plant or a solar power plant, is a multifaceted and technically complex project that requires the use of customized engineering and financial solutions to ensure its viability. The type of power plant, the choice of technologies and equipment, the scale of the project, location and other factors have a significant impact on investment costs.

The cost of building a large power plant construction is a critical factor in this equation that influences the final decision of the stakeholders.

How much does it cost to construct large power plant of different types?

The type of power plant is the main factor influencing the cost of an investment project and determining its economic viability.

However, investors must evaluate not only the cost of construction, but also other costs that will accompany a particular project throughout its life cycle. Construction costs for a wind farm and a solar power plant are typically significantly higher compared to combined cycle thermal power plants, while operating costs due to fuel costs in the latter case are many times higher than in most renewable sources.

Technical constraints, projected demand, environmental requirements, fuel consumption, maintenance, equipment modernization and other factors should be considered when planning investments in energy facilities in the long term.

Most important, however, are capital expenditures, which include the cost of all phases, from the draft to connecting the power plant to the grid.

Access to energy infrastructure, labor costs, legal frameworks, environmental restrictions, bank policies and many other factors should be taken into account in order to predict the final figure as accurately as possible. But even this does not give confidence that the project participants will be able to avoid budget overruns and construction schedule delays.

For example, the recent pandemic and geopolitical crisis in Europe came as an unpleasant surprise for numerous companies around the world, increasing the cost of some projects and calling into question the viability of others. Adding volatile prices for materials and equipment to supply chain problems, we can get a rough idea of the risks that await any company in the early stages of the energy project.

Our customized financial models, project finance services and flexible refinancing solutions can reduce the cost of capital for your project and get you through a difficult period.

Comparison of available cost options

The cost of construction is not the only criterion taken into account when choosing from several energy alternatives.

To justify the economic efficiency of different options for power plants, the method of comparative efficiency is usually used.

For the economic comparison of options, the so-called integral economic effect is used, the maximum value of which determines the most effective of them. Auxiliary criteria for comparing alternative projects are the internal rate of return, the return on investment, the payback period, financial incentives, utilization ration and others.

The integral economic effect is defined as the difference between the result of activity and costs for a certain period. The result is the proceeds from the sold electric and thermal energy, while the annual costs include the costs of building and operating a power plant of a certain type.

All compared projects are brought to an equal energy effect. In this case, this is an equal annual supply of electricity throughout the entire period of operation or the analyzed period.

As a criterion for the effectiveness, experts suggest using the total costs or the average cost of electricity supplied.

For most power plants, when determining the costs for the entire period (including the construction stage and the estimated operating life), the following is taken into account:

• capital investments;
• fuel costs (if applicable);
• modernization, major and current repair costs;
• staff salaries and services of third-party specialists;
• equipment maintenance costs;
• emission charge (if applicable);
• the cost of buying or renting land;
• land tax and other taxes and fees;
• annual payments on loans and so on.

When planning a large power plant construction, participants must clearly understand the business needs, on the basis of which technical requirements are developed and the most suitable financial models are selected.

For example, the most expensive solar power plants cost up to 1.5-2 billion euros, and the final cost of such a facility may differ significantly from the expectations of investors at the initial stage. Given the scale of construction, mistakes can cost hundreds of millions.

Construction costs for solar power plants

Modern solar power generation is based on two technologies.

Firstly, it is simple and affordable photovoltaics, which directly converts solar energy into direct current.

Secondly, it is an indirect method of concentrating solar energy using reflectors to heat a thermal transfer medium such as molten salt or a thermal oil, which then drives a turbine and generates electricity even in the absence of solar radiation.

How much does a solar PV power plant cost?

The cost of building photovoltaic systems depends on many factors, with a clear trend towards decreasing cost per megawatt of installed capacity as the scale of an investment project increases.

How much does a 1 MW solar farm cost?

This question usually starts the discussion of photovoltaic investments.

The total cost of building a photovoltaic power plant ranges from 600 thousand to 1.2 million euros per MW, depending on the project and the components used.

The cost of building solar power plants is decreasing every year due to scientific progress, the political will of leading countries and economies of scale affecting the production of equipment. The EU and most of the developed countries of the world require an increase in the production of energy from renewable sources every year, so government policies will favor investors in building more photovoltaic systems.

The emergence of more efficient photovoltaic cells and sustainable reduction in prices for photovoltaic equipment are leading to an ever faster return on investment.

In 2010, the average cost of building solar PV power plants in the world was about 4.8 million euros per megawatt of installed capacity. In 2022, this figure dropped to 800 thousand euros per MW, showing an impressive sixfold reduction in construction costs over the past 12 years.

When deciding to build a photovoltaic farm, in addition to buying inverters and panels, you need to consider land costs, construction, installation, connection, fencing and monitoring costs.

In terms of performance, an average 100 MW solar power plant located at the latitude of Northern Germany, for example, produces about 100 GWh of green energy annually.

According to studies, 1 MW of PV panels, including auxiliary equipment, require approximately 2.6-2.9 hectares of land.

Therefore, a solar power plant with an installed capacity of 50 MW will require at least 130 hectares of land, not counting administrative buildings and infrastructure. A long-term lease of land for building a solar power plant can cost from a few hundred euros to 1,000 euros or more per hectare of land annually, depending on the type of area.

It is important to take into account the costs that arise at all stages of an investment project, including the cost of operation and maintenance, the cost of financing, as well as the potential reduction in generation as a result of the natural decrease in the efficiency of photovoltaic modules.

Thanks to the rapid development of photovoltaic technology, the market offers durable PV panels, the productivity of which decreases linearly by about 15% after 25 years of operation.

The payback period of a modern photovoltaic farm reaches 8-10 years with a life cycle of about 25 years.

The cost of concentrated solar power plants (CSP)

An important advantage of such systems is the storage of energy in the form of a heated molten salt for long hours, which makes it possible to accumulate excess energy falling on reflective surfaces during daylight hours. This is very important for regions such as the Middle East and North Africa, where the intensity of solar radiation during the daytime is very high.

The largest operating power plants of this type, such as the Noor Complex Solar Power Plant (Morocco), are located in regions with the highest intensity of solar radiation, due to rational technical reasons.

Unlike photovoltaic systems, concentrated solar power plants have not shown a significant reduction in capital costs over the past decade. These are very expensive and technically complex projects based on the so-called Thermal Energy Storage technologies (TES), which are still quite capital intensive. In 2010-2011, industrial-scale CSP systems cost an average of 10 million euros per 1 MW of installed capacity, while in 2019-2020 this figure varied from 5 to 8 million euros.

Photovoltaic systems are much easier to build and install.

But like other solar power plants, CSP projects require huge land plots for the installation of reflectors, so the cost of buying / renting land plots is also high in this case.

It should also be remembered that the operation and maintenance of concentrated solar power plants is very expensive due to the use of chemical heat transfer fluids and special operating modes.

Moreover, some chemicals create certain environmental risks, which affects the cost of the project and its investment attractiveness.

Looking to the future, new research aims to transform excess carbon dioxide from atmospheric air with the help of light. In this context, CSP projects may become industrial CO2 harvesting plants over the next decades. This will start the global process of atmospheric decarbonization and open up a new source of income for the owners of next-generation concentrated solar power plants.

Construction costs for wind farms

There are many advantages of wind power, including environmental and economic ones.

The total kinetic energy of the wind in the world is estimated to be about 80 times higher than the total energy consumption of the world economy. Although only a certain percentage of this total can be used for energy needs, the future development of this technology has enormous potential.

Regardless of the type of project, building a large industrial scale wind farm is a significant investment that can require hundreds of millions of euros in the early stages. However, given the rising cost of electricity and significant advances in wind power generation, successful wind farms demonstrate payback periods of less than 10 years under favorable conditions.

For small wind power plants intended for autonomous generation, the payback period can be up to 12-15 years, depending on the type of equipment, wind speed, mode of use and other factors.

The average time required from the final investment decision to the construction of a wind farm is approximately 1 year for an onshore project and approximately 3 years for an offshore wind farm. This is largely determined by local legislation and regulatory procedures, which vary widely not only in different countries of the world, but even within the EU.

Onshore wind farms: When we talk about onshore wind projects, we mean a wide range of technological solutions of various sizes, designed both for autonomous generation and for power supply of entire cities and regions.

Economies of scale largely determine the cost of building onshore wind farm and large power plant construction

Experts estimate that the installation of a small wind turbine will cost approximately 4,500-5,000 euros per kilowatt of installed capacity. In contrast, large wind power plants cost on average €1.2 million per megawatt installed. The cost of building large wind farms is rapidly declining, primarily due to the introduction of ever more powerful wind turbines.

According to European experts, the cost of building wind farms has decreased by an average of 20-25% between 2015 and 2022, depending on the type of project and the technology used.

Spain has the lowest installed capacity cost per megawatt, while Germany and France show the highest cost of wind projects in Europe (the difference can be up to 35% for similar projects).

Despite technological advances, onshore wind energy experts expect an end to the further decline in the cost of wind farms in the near future.

This is due to factors such as inflation, rising global building material prices and natural size limits for onshore wind turbines.

Offshore wind farms: As far as offshore wind projects are concerned, they have always been more attractive to maritime countries due to the wide availability of suitable construction sites.

The sea shelf, which is not used economically, opens up unlimited opportunities for generating green energy. Another very important advantage of offshore wind turbines is the absence of strict requirements for maximum height, rotor diameter and noise level, which are serious obstacles for the development of onshore projects in densely populated areas, for example, in Europe.

The disadvantage of this technology is the relatively high cost of building offshore wind farms, which is 3-4 times higher than the cost of similar onshore projects. Huge offshore installations are difficult to transport, assemble and install both on the seabed and on floating platforms.

The initial costs associated with the development of such projects can be very high.

At the same time, rapid progress in this area allows energy companies to achieve competitive LCOE.

Over the past 12 years, the cost of an installed megawatt of offshore wind power globally has almost halved, from about 6 million euros to 3-3.5 million euros.

This progress is due to significant improvements in offshore wind power generation technology and the introduction of larger turbines reaching 16-18 MW. In particular, the latest offshore turbine Haizhuang H260-18MW from CSSC (China) was the largest in the world at the beginning of 2023.

One such unit with a 260-meter rotor diameter capable of generating about 74 GWh of electricity every year. The evolution of offshore wind turbines from standard 3-5 MW to 18 MW industrial monsters clearly demonstrates the impact of economies of scale on the cost of building and operating offshore wind farms.

Construction costs for thermal power plants

In 2023, the cost of building traditional thermal power plants will start from 600-800 thousand euros per 1 MW of installed capacity.

In most cases, energy companies have to deal with capital expenditures ranging from 1.2-1.5 million euros per megawatt and even more, depending on the chosen technology, facility location and other factors.

When choosing investment alternatives, the following types of thermal power should be considered:

• steam power plants;
• combined cycle power plants;
• gas turbine power plants.

Combined cycle thermal power plants have a high level of efficiency compared to other types of thermal power plants.

This means better performance in the long term. These power plants are usually built to meet baseline loads. However, the construction of power plants with two cycles of thermal energy requires additional costs, so CCPPs are considered to be much more expensive than traditional steam power plants. Another disadvantage is the long construction period.

The average cost of single shaft combined cycle thermal power plants without advanced emission minimization technologies is about 1-1.3 million euros per megawatt.

When it comes to installing carbon capture and sequestration equipment, the cost of the project could skyrocket to 2.5-2.8 million euros per megawatt of installed capacity.

Following the path of increasing efficiency, some companies are now focusing on building advanced ultra-supercritical coal-fired power plants (AUSC). These power plants with special technologies for burning finely dispersed coal produce steam at a temperature of 700-750 C, reaching net efficiency rates of 49-50%.

These impressive figures require the use of expensive equipment and heat-resistant materials, which increases the cost of building typical AUSC power plants to 3 million euros per megawatt of installed capacity.

The introduction of carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technologies increases the cost of such power plants to 5-6 million euros per megawatt.

Equipment, building materials (eg steel and aluminium) and labor are important factors influencing the final cost of thermal power plants.

Most projects of this type take at least 3-5 years, so fluctuations in variable costs are important to consider when planning investment projects and large power plant construction.

Construction costs for hydropower plants

In 2022, the average cost of building hydroelectric power plants and large power plant construction in the world was about 1.9 million euros per megawatt of installed capacity.

There are no signs of price declines in this segment as the hydropower sector relies heavily on available land and civil works costs rather than on changing technologies. Today it is one of the most expensive power generation technologies in the world.

Moreover, the rising cost of labor and building materials are making this type of power plant increasingly expensive for investors.

For example, between 2010 and 2022, the average cost of hydroelectric power plants increased by 30-50%, depending on the region and project type.

Despite high construction costs, hydropower plants remain the backbone of low-carbon power generation. These facilities do not require significant operating and maintenance costs, which makes the generated electricity affordable and competitive.

In addition to large powerful hydroelectric power plants, which have been actively built in East Asia in recent years, business is interested in mini-hydroepower plants.

These are small facilities with an installed capacity of no more than 10-30 MW (classification depends on the country), capable of providing cheap electricity to plants, factories and remote settlements that do not have access to the power grid.

The cost of such power plants per megawatt will be higher compared to large projects, but the potential for local power generation is huge, especially in countries with numerous small rivers (eg UK, Canada, Brazil, Poland, Romania and others).

Construction costs for geothermal power plants

Geothermal facilities are characterized by a wide variety of technologies used, which explains the differences in project costs of large power plant construction.

Much depends on the type of project, location, depth and temperature of the geothermal source and a number of other factors. On average, the cost of geothermal power plants in 2023 varies from 3 to 5 million euros per megawatt.

Dry steam, binary cycle or other engineering decisions largely determine the financial aspects of a particular project. Obviously, the direct use of hot water available close to the ground requires a much lower investment compared to drilling deep wells. Moreover, exploration work in the early stages of a project may require millions of euros of investment, and these funds must be raised by the owners in an environment of economic uncertainty and risk.

Unlike large power plant construction as solar or wind energy, geothermal projects have not fallen in price over the past decade.

Investment costs of large power plant construction are affected by the high cost of drilling equipment, as well as the rising cost of labor and building materials, which account for a large share of the total cost of such projects.

According to Fitch Solution, construction costs for geothermal power plants have increased from 2.6 million euros per megawatt in 2010 to 4.4 million euros per megawatt in 2020. Due to technical constraints and high capital costs, the levelized cost of electricity generated from geothermal sources, also remains relatively high, which hinders the further development of this sector.

Not surprisingly, geothermal power plants remain the second choice for a limited number of countries with favorable geological conditions.

These include the United States, the Philippines, Indonesia, Mexico, Turkey, Japan, Italy, New Zealand and a number of other countries that are developing geothermal power generation despite the difficulties.

If you are interested in financing a major energy project, please contact the CP Finance UK FINANCE LIMITED for details.

We offer long-term loans starting from 50 million euros, and we also develop customized project finance solutions for the construction of large power plants, electrical substations and other energy infrastructure.

CP Finance UK FINANCE LIMITED
Website:https://c-pfinanceuk.com/
E-mail:finance@cpuk-financeltd.com
Alt-Email:admin@cpukfinanceltd.com

Companies are not always able to fully finance their needs from internal financial resources, which is the reason for using loan financing for current business activities and even for the implementation of long-term projects.

Alternatively, companies may also use leasing, factoring or short-term borrowing from customers and suppliers.

Very few companies, from small and medium-sized businesses to large global players, can freely finance all investment projects, the purchase of goods or the development of infrastructure with their own capital, which potentially reduces their liquidity.

Companies tend to resort to a loan financing tool for the implementation of capital-intensive projects.

Due to the large number of available types of loans, businesses seek to find a reliable partner who will provide professional support and mediation both in choosing the right financing instruments and in working with potential lenders.

CP Finance UK Finance offers customized schemes and models of loan financing for any needs of large businesses.

We offer the following services:

• Project finance.
• Long-term investment lending.
• Financial modeling and consulting.
• Documentary letters of credit.
• Loan guarantees, etc.

Benefit from a free initial consultation with our experts to find suitable solutions and good loan terms. Contact us anytime to get professional financial support for your projects.

Brief overview of credit and loan financing

Credit and loan financing is primarily understood as the use of borrowed funds for the implementation of certain projects.

It serves an element of external financing of economic activities, which plays an important role in any business. With debt financing, the company receives external capital.

The investor financing the bank does not become a shareholder of the company. However, the lender returns the main part of the loan and interest. If the company goes bankrupt, the bank even has the right to part of the debtor’s assets. On the other hand, the lender has no voting rights and is not responsible for the actions of the borrower.

Loan funds are provided to the borrower only for a limited period of time within the term of the loan agreement.

With loan financing, the company raises external capital for both short-term and long-term needs. While short-term debt financing gives companies the financial flexibility they need, long-term loans in large volumes can make businesses more dependent on lenders.

What should be considered when using credit instruments?

In order for a company to successfully apply for loan financing, lending institutions request appropriate collateral and detailed project documentation for review. This allows banks to ensure that the borrowing company is really creditworthy and is really able to repay the borrowed funds on the agreed terms.

Documents attached to a loan financing application usually include the following:

• Project business plan.
• Feasibility study.
• Profit and loss statements.
• Information about the borrower’s assets.
• Debt obligations.

This information is carefully checked by credit institutions.

On this basis, the final decision is made on whether and to what extent it is acceptable to provide loan financing for a particular company.

Terms of business loans

A key role for business is played by the differentiation of forms of financing according to their terms.

Depending on which expenses or investments are to be covered by the loan, the decision is usually made in favor of one of two options:

• Short-term loan financing includes all types of borrowed capital, which is used only for a short period of time and is repaid no later than in a few months. This kind of loan financing is usually very flexible for companies and allows businesses to overcome short-term bottlenecks in current operations.

• Long-term loan financing allows companies to make larger investments in debt financing or cover expenses over a longer period of time. This form of financing usually includes bonds or loans for a period of several years.

Short-term debt financing is critical for a company as it helps to overcome short-term difficulties.

In most cases, short-term loan agreements are very flexible and tailored to specific financial models to allow borrowers to repay current debt in a series of payments over several months.

On the other hand, long-term loan financing is suitable for the most costly investments. This explains the high capital requirements that can only be provided by third parties. This form of financing also creates a certain dependence of the company on the financing bank. On the other hand, small and medium-sized businesses get a real opportunity to finance large investments.

These are loans for at least 3-5 years, but they can be issued for up to 30 years. Usually, loans are negotiated with a fixed interest rate, but may also have floating interest rates. Companies primarily seek to use long-term loan financing to finance investments in fixed assets or refinancing.

The cost of loan financing

The real cost of loan financing is an important consideration for a potential borrower and its project partners.

Banks expect to receive interest on the capital provided, and financing conditions can vary significantly depending on the type, scale and timing of the project.

Business loan financing conditions depend on the following factors:

• The creditworthiness of the borrowing company.
• The presence of assets that can serve as collateral for the loan.
• Providing loan guarantees from third parties.
• The credit risk according to the financial institution’s own assessments.
• Agreed deadline and schedule for the return of funds.
• Interest rates and terms of refinancing.
• Bank financial plans.
• Other factors.

Thus, it is in the interests of the company to timely take into account a set of internal and external factors on the level of costs when planning loan financing.

To optimize cash flows and ensure financing of strategic projects, it is recommended to use the services of professionals who are able to comprehensively assess the situation, develop an individual financial model for a specific investment project and find suitable sources of capital.

Alternatives to loan financing

CP Finance UK FINANCE LIMITED
Website:https://c-pfinanceuk.com/
E-mail:finance@cpuk-financeltd.com
Alt-Email:admin@cpukfinanceltd.com

Companies taking their first steps in the funding the construction of hotels and hospitality business often experience difficulties in financing projects.

Sometimes they don’t have experience in the industry, they don’t have a credit history, and they don’t even have adequate collateral.

Obviously, before starting any capital-intensive project, it is critical to conduct a comprehensive study of the company and consult with the top management who plans to invest in the hotel. This work should address the possibility of obtaining funds to finance the project and analyze the most effective ways to attract them.

Financing of large projects in the hotel business can be carried out using a wide range of internal and external resources.

Equity capital can be generated as a result of current operating activities (for example, current income from other hotels, retained earnings, depreciation, sale of assets), as well as by increasing the company’s authorized capital. An increase in the authorized capital can be carried out through contributions of the owners or by attracting new partners (issue of new shares).

An important way to raise capital is the cooperation of the hotel business with venture capital funds. Venture capital funds are involved in high-risk projects with above-average potential returns. As a rule, such projects are not accepted by large banks due to an excessively high level of risk.

The most common debt securities that serve as an instrument for funding the construction of hotels and hospitality facilities  are bonds.

Other securities that are used relatively rarely include bills of exchange and warrants.

Bonds are securities issued in series, in which the issuer confirms the debt to the creditor and undertakes to perform a specific action in relation to him. Bonds come in different types depending on the type of issuer, maturity, face value, interest rate, additional options and ways to minimize the investment risk of a particular project.